Fitness trackers, sleep, and the questions of precision they increase were the main topic of a recent article compiled by Hugo Mercier, CEO of Dream, released in The Huffington Post. What makes fitness trackers inefficient in measuring sleep? If you’re at all interested in your well being, it’s likely you’ve joined the 20 percent of Americans who’ve incorporated fitness trackers into their daily ensemble.
From monitoring steps and daily activity to rest, an ever-growing amount of devices are examining and monitoring our body’s data in an effort to make us better. But how good is this tracking? Despite commendable intentions, the scientific reality is that much of the data these fitness trackers provide is inadequate and inaccurate.
Pour the smoothie in a glass and drink it fresh before it loses its properties
Group & Pension
14 oz can basil, oregano, garlic diced tomatoes
Dual-core Samsung Exynos 9110 clocked at 1.15GHz
Excercise is an excellent stress reducer
Eating too much fats on the low-carb diet
Photo by Kelly McGrail
In change, they are not as effective as they promise. This is also true when it comes to rest. Sleep scientists have looked at sleep wearables, like Fitbit and Jawbone, with skepticism. Once and for all reason. As the devices claim to monitor and help you sleep, scientific precision isn’t guaranteed. Why Here’s? Sensors in the unit measure acceleration, duration, intensity, frequency, and patterns associated with our heart motion and rate. Looking at tossing, and turning in a night versus what’s going on inside our bodies don’t give us much depth. Current fitness trackers on the market are made of advanced technology and detectors. They are able to monitor an array of body functions.
However, they don’t cut it as it pertains to sleep. Sleep trackers use actigraphy, which measures movement at a very high level. Translating these motions into sleep patterns is challenging Precisely. It is more comparable to guesswork even, not something you should build around your healthy living plan. Right now the hardware that can track sleep accurately – mainly the EEG reader – is definitely available in large format labs. So due to challenges linked with affordability, comfort, and simplicity, tracking movement has been the default way to assess sleep, though it doesn’t really map to results.
You have the results – now what? It’s a very important factor to monitor your behavior but to truly improve your wellbeing, shouldn’t something do more for all of us? Sleep in the framework of this “self-betterment” model has to deliver on a lot more than just tracking or monitoring based on data that is inaccurate. The hard truth about these parables is that fitness trackers do very little to change our aggressive behavior. The existing market is flooded with fitness trackers that let you know that you strolled three kilometers or slept 6.2 hours.
But is there devices that do more to motivate action or do something that will in actuality impact your rest? To answer that relevant question, one must recognize that the only accurate way to monitor your sleep quality is by measuring your brain activity or EEG (electroencephalogram). And this is not a recent development.
These standard different rest phases have been long founded by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. They derive from your EEG. Recent developments in technology can power real-time evaluation and monitoring of your brain activity. We have to now be able to do a much better job to track sleep accurately and improve sleep habits.
So how will you sleep better? The larger question about products that are on the marketplace is: So how exactly does monitoring impact sleep quality? We know that simply being conscious of it doesn’t get us anywhere. So, will there be anything useful that these devices can do much better than us actually?